[2025:RJ-JP:33738] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15897/2023 Chetan Verma S/o Madanlal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Raigro Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 9, Kasba Jamwa Ramgarh, Thana Jamwa Ramgarh, Dist Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Mahesh Meena S/o Ramjilal Meena, R/o Beda Ki Dhani, Medraj Singhpura, Jamwa Ramgarh, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3705/2023 Dharmveer @ Deepak S/o Kanaram Rawat, R/o Chomukha, Presently Sau Road, Jamwaramgarh, Police Station Jamwaram- garh, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor, Jaipur Dis- trict Jaipur. 2. Mahesh Meena S/o Shri Ramjilal Meena, R/o Theda Ki Dhani, Mendrajsinghpura, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15543/2023 Harsh Baroliya S/o Sh. Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Raigaron Ka Mohalla, Kasba Jamwa Ramgarh, Police Station Jamva Ramgarh, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined At District Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Mahesh Meena S/o Sh. Ramji Lal Meena, R/o Beda Ki Dhani, Medrajsinghpura, Police Station Jamva Ramgarh, [2025:RJ-JP:33738] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15897/2023] District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. narendra Singh Gurjar Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam Mr. Rajesh Goswami Mr. Satyendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Prasad Sharma Mr. Lakhan Sharma Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/08/2025 1. These bail applications are filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Chetan Verma S/o Madanlal, Dhar- mveer @ Deepak S/o Kanaram Rawat and Harsh Baroliya S/o Sh. Kanhaiya Lal in FIR No. 187/2023 dated 28.08.2023 registered at P.S. Jamwa Ramgarh District Jaipur Rural, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Sections 302 IPC. 2. During course of argument, learned counsel for applicants submits that the sessions case is scheduled for cross-examination of PW-2 (Purshottam) and they offer to withdraw instant bail ap- plications with liberty to file after conclusion of cross-examination of PW-2. 3. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor, these bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. The Trial Court is directed to ensure that the cross-examina- tion of PW-2 (Purshotam Lal) is concluded on priority basis. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /27-29