Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33826 (KAR)

SMT P SATHYAPREMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/26684/2024 · 2025-01-09

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:730 WP No. 26684 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 26684 OF 2024 (C) BETWEEN: 1. SMT P SATHYAPREMA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, W/O. LATE G. SANNAVEERANNA, 1ST CROSS, V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. 2. SRI. C.P. MADHU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O. LATE C. AKKI REDDY, PROPRIETOR BASAVESHWARA MOTORS, OLD INCOME TAX BUILDING, 2ND CROSS, V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA -577 501. 3. SRI. C.P. NATARAJ, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O. LATE C. AKKI REDDY, PROPRIETOR BASAVESHWARA MOTORS, OLD INCOME TAX BUILDING, 2ND CROSS, V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAMA BHAT K,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS UNDERSECRETARY TO GOVT., DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION AND PUBLIC RELATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU. Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:730 WP No. 26684 of 2024 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DY. COMMISSIONER, OBAVVA CIRCLE, CHITRADURGA - TOWN. 3. SMT. P. SUSHEELAMMA, AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS, W/O. LATE G. VEERANNA, R/AT. OPP. RESERVE POLICE STATION, NEAR MAJESTIC CIRCLE, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. 4. SRI. P. KIRAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. LATE G. SANNA VEERANNA, SRI. BASAVESHWARA PICTURE PALACE, HORAPETE, CHITRADURGA 577 501. 5. DR.BASAVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE G VEERANNA AND SMT P SUSHEELAMMA, R/AT NO.58, 1ST BLOCK, 15TH MAIN, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560034. (AMENDED AS PER ORDER DT:12.11.2024 ON IA 1/24) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M RAJAKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2, SMT VEENA J KAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI K J KAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R5, SRI P KIRAN (R4) PARTY-IN-PERSON IS PRESENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION AND THEREBY SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER NO. ENT.CR.18/2016-17 DTD. 17.09.2024 ISSUED BY THE R-2 REVOKING THE CINEMA LICENCE GRANTED FOR ONE YEAR AS PER ANNX-A. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:730 WP No. 26684 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER Vide order dated 01.10.2024, this matter was referred to Karnataka Mediation Centre, Bangalore. The settlement report is submitted before the Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for respondents No.3 and 5 are present before this Court. Respondent No.4-party-in-person is present before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for respondents No.3 and 5 identify respondent No.4 who is present before the Court. 4. It is stated that respondent No.3 has agreed to receive a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- through Demand Draft specified in the memorandum of settlement. It is further stated that due to inadvertence, Demand Draft is not brought to the Court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that respondent No.4 who is present before the Court will hand - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:730 WP No. 26684 of 2024 over the Demand Draft referred to in memorandum of settlement by tomorrow i.e., by 10.01.2025. 6. This Court has perused the terms of settlement. This Court has no impediment to accept the terms of the settlement. 7. Subject to payment of the amount referred to above, settlement is accepted. 8. Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the memorandum of settlement. In case, the aforesaid Demand Draft is not received by respondent No.2, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to move application to recall the order as per the terms of the settlement. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26