1 2025:CGHC:38514 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7529 of 2025 1 - Jay Singh Jafri S/o Shri Mehttar Lal Jafri Aged About 40 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) In Govt. Primary School Charpara, Block Kharsiya, District - Raigarh (C.G.) R/o Fakir Chowk Road Sindhi Colony Ward No. 13, Behind Ganj , Kharsiya District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director School Education Department, Bilaspur Division Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Kharsiya District - Raigarh (C.G.) 7 - Principal / Head Master Govt. Primary School Charpara Block Kharsiya District - Raigarh (C.G.) 8 - Principal / Head Master Govt. Primary School Munund Block Dharamjaigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhuvneshwar Singh Rajput, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy A.G. VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.04 18:51:19 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 04/08/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner bearing WPS No. 6199 of 2025, against his transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 25.06.2025 with liberty to file duly constituted petition. Thereafter, the petitioner move a representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee, and the said representation has been rejected by the authorities concerned on 20.06.2025 (Annexure P/1). Now this petition has been filed after rejection of said representation. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection, if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 3 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law, as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved