Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33814 (HP)

ANTIM MAHAJAN v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANR

COPC/978/2025 · 2025-12-09

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.978 of 2025 Decided on: 09.12.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Antim Mahajan ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar and Anr …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Respondents have filed the compliance affidavit placing on record office order dated 27.09.2025. Operative portion of which reads as under:- “Now, therefore,, with the prior approval of the Govt. as per letter No. EDN-A- Chha(1)-7/2025 dated: 11.09.;2025 and in compliance to the Hon'ble High Court order dated 25.03.2025, the services of Ms. Antim Mahaian is hereby re-engaged as Lecturer(School New) English on PTA GIA basis w.e.f 18.01.2007 at GSSS Duhak District Kangra, H.P. against vacancy as the post of Lecturer English at GSSS Sanghole Distt Kangra is filled up and also the services of petitioner are hereby 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - regularized as Lecturer (School New) in the Cell 1 of level 12 i.e. Rs. 43000/- as per HPCS (RP) Rules, 2022 w.e f. 20.08.2020 on notional basis and she shall not be entitled to any monetary benefits till her actual joining.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges that services of the petitioner have now been reengaged and her services have also been regularized, but has some reservations to the aforesaid office order. 3. Taking note of the compliance affidavit and the office order placed on record, present contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy of the redressal of her surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge December 9, 2025 R.Atal