Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22863 CMP No. 897 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 897 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
SHVIJ FLOORINGS REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, 34, 2ND CROSS, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, KESHWAPUR, HUBBALI-580023. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
ITHACA ESTATES PVT. LTD.
#37/21, SKYLARK CHAMBERS, ULSOOR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 042. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE)
THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, PRAYING TO NOMINATE/APPOINT SUITABLE ARBITRATOR FOR RESOLUTION OF THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT ARISING OUT OF AND IN CONSEQUENT TO WORK
ORDER DATED 30.01.2019 EXECUTED BETWEEN PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE A THE COPY OF THE WORK ORDER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22863 CMP No. 897 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Case called. None appears for the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, none appeared for the parties. It was made clear that if the learned counsel for the parties failed to appear on the next date of hearing, an appropriate order will be passed including the dismissal of the petition. Even today, case called, none appears for the petitioner. As the petition is of the year 2022, it seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
2. In view of the peremptory order, I do not find any grounds to adjourn the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS