Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33805 (KAR)

SRI K ESHWAR PRASAD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/26683/2024 · 2025-04-03

Krishna S Dixit, Ramachandra D Huddar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14071-DB WP No. 26683 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 26683 OF 2024 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SRI. K. ESHWAR PRASAD, S/O LATE K. KRISHNAN, AGE 45 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK PANCHAYAT, ZILLA PANCHAYAT, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. R/AT # 283, 'BRINDAVANA', 100 FEET ROAD, 4TH PHASE, 7TH BLOCK, BSK III STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAO BHOUNSLE.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ, M S BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIKAS ROJIPURA, AGA FOR R1) Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14071-DB WP No. 26683 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER IN A. No. 1756 OF 2023 DATED 31.05.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-D PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU AND FURTHER PLEASED TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Four opportunities for addressing the office objections earlier given have gone in vain. Fifth time, the matter has come before the Court. There is no representation from the side of the petitioner, either. In view of the above, Court presumes that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the cause and therefore, the petition is accordingly dismissed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14071-DB WP No. 26683 of 2024 Registry to send a copy of this order to the petitioner by speed post. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6