IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 20250 of 2025 Decided on: 23.12.2025. Maan Singh Thakur …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? ……………………………………………………………………………… For the petitioner: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 25.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors, CWP No.1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024, has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 25.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Sushil Kukreja) Judge December 23, 2025(yogesh)