Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33805 (CHH)

YUKTI CHANDRAKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/276/2021 · 2025-07-21

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:35201 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 276 of 2021 1 - Yukti Chandrakar D/o Vijay Chandrakar Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 07, Ajad Chowk, Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 2 - Anjum Bano D/o Fahim Mohammad Aged About 29 Years R/o Kumharpara 1, Baroda Bazar District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3 - Anshu Sharma D/o B. Sharma Aged About 32 Years R/o Bhilai, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh 4 - Parvinder Kaur D/o Darshan Singh Aged About 31 Years R/o Old Fish Market, Shivaji Chouk, Baba Colony, Camp-02, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - Doctor Das Kosare D/o Ajeeb Das Kosare Aged About 33 Years R/o House No. 126, Ward No. 09, Village Gokana, Post Gandai, Gokana District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 6 - Sanjay Kumar S/o Santosh Kumar Aged About 28 Years R/o 275, Nipani, Balod, Nipani District Balod Chhattisgarh 7 - Chowa Ram Yadav S/o Meghuram Yadav Aged About 34 Years R/o Ladijob, Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 8 - Dameshwar Ram Sahu S/o Bhoj Ram Aged About 28 Years R/o 203, Surra, Gayatri Para, Ward No. 10, District Balod Chhattisgarh 9 - Sabindra Kumar Sahu S/o Santram Sahu Aged About 33 Years R/o R/o Plot No. 54, Vivekanand Nagar, Kohka, Ward No. 08, Supela Bhiali District Durg Chhattisgarh 10 - Neha Baghel W/o Khilesh Kumar Aged About 30 Years R/o Nawapara, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.07.23 10:31:42 +0530 2 11 - Sandeep Kumar Chandrakar S/o Giteshwar Prasad Aged About 27 Years R/o Godela, Balod District Balod Chhattisgarh 12 - Suresh Kumar Sahu S/o Dindayal Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Sadak Para, Ward-01, Dadhari, Dhaneli, Gurul, Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh 13 - Naresh Kumar Sao S/o Shyam Lal Sao Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 38, Village Parrapat, Chhotemri 1, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 14 - Ritubala Kamde D/o Ajay Kamde Aged About 29 Years R/o 307, Ward No. 27, Ramnagar, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 15 - Naresh Kumar Kashyap S/o Laibano Das Kashyap Aged About 37 Years R/o House No. 119, Tikrapara, Khugaon, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 16 - Deepesh Kumar S/o Dasru Ram Sahu Aged About 31 Years R/o 672, Bhuwan Gudi Chowk, 19, Loharsi, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 17 - Yamuna Nirmalkar D/o Hemlal Nirmalkar Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Jarway, Post Office Bhansuli, Teshil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh 18 - Rameshwar Nishad S/o Vyas Narain Nishad Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Tulsi, Post Office Bathena, Tehsil Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh 19 - Dipuka Kurre D/o Vidyacharan Kurre Aged About 29 Years R/o Nayak Bandhu, Abhanpur, Ward 07, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 20 - Anil Kumar Patel S/o Tilak Chand Patel Aged About 31 Years R/o C/o Tilakchand, House No. 21k, Ward No. 11, Jarwahi, Jarwahi, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 21 - Hemlata Nishad D/o Gopi Nath Nishad Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 59/2, Ward 04, Gram Salhebhata, Post Salhebhata District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 22 - Riddhi Sahu W/o Buddhdev Sahu Aged About 31 Years R/o 50/kh, Ward Ni. 09, Indra Nagar, Durg Utai, District Durg Chhattisgarh 3 23 - Pawan Kumar Sahu S/o Santosh Das Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 15, Ward No. 01, Machanpara, Tumdibod, Dongargaon, District Rajnandogaon Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Bastar District South Bastar Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer District South Bastar Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None, even in second round For State/ Respondents : Mr. Topilal Bareth, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 22/07/2025 1) As there is no representation on behalf of petitioners even when the matter is taken up for hearing in second round, there is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. 2) Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya