Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3380 (CAL)

FARJANA KHATON v. ABDUL GAFFAR AND ANR

CO/4110/2025 · 2026-08-20

Rai Chattopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.O. 4110 of 2025 Farjana Khaton -vs- Abdul Gaffar & Anr. 20.8.2026 ct.652, sl.no.16 sk Ms. Sohini Chakraborty Ms. P.Das …..for the petitioner 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Chakraborty, learned advocate appears for the opposite parties. She has filed in Court a report of Nazir, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Durgapur. On the basis of the same she has submitted that in execution of the decree, possession has been obtained by the opposite parties/decree holders. 3. In such view of the fact, the instant revision has become infructuous. 4. Considering the submissions of learned advocate as above and perusing the document as above, it is directed that the present revision being CO 4110 of 2025 is disposed of “being infructuous”. (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.) 2