CHODAGAM VIJAY KUMAR, KRISHNA DISTRICT v. PRL SECY, EXCISE DEPT, HYD & 3 OTH
WA/135/2012 · 2025-09-15
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33792 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33792 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010512422012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 135 of 2012 Bench Sr.No:-17 [3483] Chodagam Vijay Kumar, Krishna District ...Appellant Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for appellant
: Sri P. Jagga Reddy representing Sri O. Manoher Reddy Advocate for respondents : Learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 16th September 2025 P C : Sri P. Jagga Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri O. Manoher Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, states that the matter has been rendered infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J AMD
78
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 135 of 2012
Dt:16.09.2025
AMD