- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9734 WP No. 28183 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 28183 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI G SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O SRI GOVINDAPPA R/AT NO 22, 4TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS OPP GIRIYAS, KATHRIGUPPPE LAYOUT BANGALORE SOUTH BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BANGALORE 560085 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.NAGESH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU 560001 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU 560009 3. THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL BENGALURU 562106 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA., AGA) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9734 WP No. 28183 of 2024 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-3 TO TAKE TIMELY ACTION ON THE APPLICATION DATED 09.07.2024 REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNEXUR-A, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. It is the case of the petitioner that his name was being reflected in the revenue records in respect of the land bearing Sy.No.155, measuring 4 acres situated at Hulimangala Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru District, but from the year 2001 onwards, on the computerization of the revenue records, his name has been omitted. 2. It is his case that, despite a representation being made in this regard, no action has been taken. 3. In the light of the said grievance, it would be appropriate to direct respondent No.3 to consider the request of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9734 WP No. 28183 of 2024 in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 4. It is needless to state that nothing said in this order shall be construed as rendering any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. 5. This petition is accordingly disposed of. 6. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5