Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33770 (CAL)

SADHAN CHANDRA KARMAKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/17288/2022 · 2025-03-20

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L 14 25.04.2025 Bpg. ct.no.35 W.P.A.17288 of 2022 With CAN 1 of 2025 Sadhan Chandra Karmakar Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Pritam Chowdhury. …for the applicants/ respondent nos.7 to 12. Mr. Swapan Banerjee Mr. Diptendu Narayan Banerjee. …for the State-respondents. Mr. Soumik Ganguli. …for the respondent no. 4. Affidavit-of-service filed by the applicants /respondent nos.7 to 12 be kept with the record. Learned advocate for the applicants /respondent nos.7 to 12 and respondent no.4 is present. However, none appears on behalf of the State continuously. Accordingly, Mr. Swapan Banerjee, learned advocate, along with Mr. Diptendu Narayan Banerjee, learned advocate, who ordinarily appear on behalf of the State, are directed to represent the State. Their appearance may be regularized by the concerned authorities. 2 Mr. Banerjee would communicate to the Inspector-in-Charge, Bankura Police Station not to give effect to the order dated 20.03.2025 till the connected application is taken up on 16th May, 2025. List the matter under the heading “Application” on 16.05.2025. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)