IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 141 CRM-M-15707-2025 Date of decision: April 1st, 2025 Om Parkash and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present: Ms. Kusum Raj, Advocate for Mr. A.D.S. Jattana, Advocate for the petitioners. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) A request for adjournment has yet again been made on behalf of the learned arguing counsel for the petitioners. 2. A perusal of all the previous orders reveal that not even on a single occasion, arguments have been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. It is, thus, evident that the case is being adjourned time and again and the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter any further. 4. Even Hon’ble the Supreme Court on 19.11.2024 in Nilesh Dnyaneshwar Desale Versus The State of Maharashtra: SLP (Criminal) Diary No.22040/2024 deprecated the practice of adjournments and dismissed the case for want of prosecution. 5. In the circumstances, the instant petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. April 1st, 2025 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : YesNo PUNEET SACHDEVA 2025.04.01 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh