2025:HHC:36630 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.965 of 2019 Decided on : 31.10.2025 __________________________________________________________ Tribhushan Kumar .....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Disha Pal, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Ms. Disha Pal, Advocate, appearing as Vice Counsel, for Learned Original Counsel, Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, on Instructions of petitioner states that due to subsequent events, petitioner is not interested to continue with the instant proceedings hereinafter and the same may be given a closure. [Statement is taken on record]. 2. Prayer being innocuous, is not opposed. 3. Accordingly, in terms of the Statement of 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:36630 Learned Counsel appearing for petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge October 31, 2025 [Bhardwaj]