SMT. VIMLESH KANWAR WIFE OF LATE SHRI MAHENDRA SINGH RATHORE v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/19780/2019 · 2025-01-09
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33763 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33763 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19780/2019 Smt. Vimlesh Kanwar Wife Of Late Shri Mahendra Singh Rathore ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hem Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna, Mr. Rahul Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 09/01/2025
1. Instant writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 14.09.2021 and respondents were directed to submit compliance affidavit of the order within a period of nine weeks.
2. In compliance of the order dated 14.09.2021, for and on behalf of respondent-Corporation, an affidavit of making compliance of the order dated 14.09.2021 has been deposed and filed by one Mahesh Tiwari, the nominated Officer Incharge. In the affidavit, details of retiral benefits, calculated and released in favour of petitioner, have been mentioned in para No. 3. In para No.4, it has been stated that no other dues remain payable to the petitioner. In respect of interest of gratuity, an amount of Rs.2,82,104/- has been calculated in para No.5 and in para No.9 it has been urged that the interest amount shall be paid to petitioner in seriatim as per Circular of the Corporation dated 03.11.2021.
3. In response to the affidavit of compliance, filed by and on behalf of Corporation, petitioner has filed an additional affidavit
(2 of 2) [CW-19780/2019] dated 1st February, 2022 wherein she has accepted to receive all the retiral benefits though an amount of Rs.9921/- towards gazette holidays has been alleged to be unpaid. Such amount of Rs.9921/-, against the gazetted holidays has been stated to be due on the basis of a reply to her Right to Information application dated 10.04.2019. Such an issue has already been considered and decided by this Court in the final order dated 14.09.2021 and final
order has been complied with.
4. In that view of matter, the affidavit in compliance of the
order dated 14.09.2021, is taken on record.
5. As far as payment of interest on the delayed payment of gratuity, as calculated by the respondents in affidavit, is concerned, counsel for both the parties are agreeable to ensure the payment of such amount as per Circular of the Corporation dated 03.11.2021.
6. The writ petition be consigned to record.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/32