Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33762 (BOM)

ASHRUBA GANPATI NAGARGOJE DIED THR LRS MOHAN ASHRUBA NAGARGOJE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

WP/426/2025 · 2025-02-03

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

910-WP-424, 426-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 WRIT PETITION NO. 424 OF 2025 VAIJNATH NAGURAO NEHARKAR AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 426 OF 2025 ASHRUBA GANPATI NAGARGOJE DIED THR LRS MOHAN ASHRUBA NAGARGOJE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS .… Mr. R. A. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for the Respondents – State .… CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 08.07.2025 PER COURT :- 1. The Registry has forwarded the communication sent through the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Beed, in the context of the specific direction issued to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Majalgaon, District Beed, in the order dated 03.02.2025, 1 of 2 (( 2 )) 910-WP-424, 426-2025 passed by this Court (Coram: Mangesh S. Patil and Prafulla S. Khubalkar, JJ.). By the said order, inter-alia, directions were issued to the said Court to take urgent steps to pay compensation to the Petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case within three months. 2. The request forwarded to this Court details the reasons why the direction could not be complied with, and sets out the grounds on which extension of time is sought. 3. Considering the material placed on record, extension of time by five months is granted to the said Court to comply with the directions contained in the aforesaid order dated 03.02.2025. 4. It is made clear that no further extension would be granted. [ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ MANISH PITALE, J. ] SMS 2 of 2