Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33760 (KAR)

SUMAN V B v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.A/2053/2023 · 2025-02-18

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7198 CRL.A No. 2053 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2053 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SUMAN V.B. S/O VENKATESH MURTHY AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS NO.1016, 1ST FLOOR, O.T.C. ROAD, NAGARTHPET NEAR DHARMARAYA SWAMY TEMPLE, NAGARTHPET, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE - 560 002 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR VINDHYALA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE HALASURUGATE POLICE STATION BENGALURU - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001 2. MANIKANTA K (MANIKANDAN) S/O LATE KANAN R/AT NO.82/2, SADARA PRATAP ROAD NEAR MARIYAMMA TEMPLE, KUMARAPETE BUILDING IN DOWNWARD RIGHT SIDE OF RAM MEDICAL BENGALURU - 560 002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP FOR R1) Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7198 CRL.A No. 2053 of 2023 THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE LXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-71) AT BENGALURU IN CRL.MISC.NO.9504/2023 DATED 12.10.2023 AND ENLARGE HIM ON BAIL IN CR.NO.247/2023, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE LXX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-71) AT BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 506, 341, 504, 307 OF IPC AND SECTION 3(1)(r)(s) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT, REGISTERED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT POLICE STATION ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, which reads as under: "The appellant submits that subsequent to filing of this appeal the respondent No.1 has submitted that chargesheet, in view of the changed circumstances, the appellant prefers to file a fresh bail petition before the Hon'ble Trial Court and hence, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal with a liberty to file a fresh Bail petition before this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice." 2. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10