Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33760 (CAL)

SAIFUL MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16641/2025 · 2025-08-25

Subhendu Samanta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ASR 86. Ct. no. 24. 25.08.2025 WPA 16641 of 2025 Saiful Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Munmun Ganguly Mr. Sambuddha Dutta ……For the State None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call. State is represented by learned counsel Mr. Sambuddha Dutta. Learned counsel for the State submits that the instant writ petition is not maintainable. He submits petitioner is an unsuccessful candidate having secured very less mark than the successful candidate. However, as the petitioner is no turning up, he might have lost interest to proceed with this matter further. Under the above circumstances, the instant writ petition is dismissed for default. [Subhendu Samanta, J]