Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3376 (UTT)

MUKESH MOHAN PHONDANI v. PUNAM PHONDANI

AO/95/2020 · 2025-03-19

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1926-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS AO No.95 of 2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. S.K. Mandal, learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This is an appeal under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, filed in 2020, challenging the order dated 20.01.2020 passed by Additional Judge, Family Court, Rishikesh whereby amendment application filed by appellant was rejected. 3. Mr. S.K. Mandal, learned counsel for appellant submits that Original Suit No.20 of 2018, in which the application, seeking leave to amendment was filed and rejected, has been decided by the court concerned vide judgment dated 03.08.2023. Therefore, the appeal has become infructuous. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for appellant, appeal is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 19.03.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.04.03 15:25:10 +05'30'