HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17273 of 2021 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant. However, Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel for C.B.I. is present. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in RC No. 1202018A0009 of 2018, Special Case No. 01 of 2021, under Sections 420 IPC read with Section 120B IPC and Sections 9, 13(2) read with 13(1)(D) P.C. Act, Police Station C.B.I./ACB Ghaziabad with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for C.B.I. submits, applicant has already been enlarged on regular bail in the instant matter, therefore, instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 4. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous. September 18, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sr. Advocate, Vinod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rahul Srivastava, Sanjay Kumar Yadav (Sameer Jain,J.) Sanjay Kumar .....Applicant(s) C.B.I. / A.C.B. Ghaziabad .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad