Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3374 (ORI)

M/S KALINGA POLYPACK PVT LTD, CUTTACK v. TATA POWER CENTRAL ODISHA DISTRIBUTION LTD, BBSR

WP(C)/22430/2025 · 2026-05-02

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.22430 of 2025 M/s. Kalinga Polypack Pvt. Ltd., Cuttack …. Petitioner Mr. A.U. Senapati, Adv. -versus- Tata Power Central Odisha Distribution Ltd., BBSR & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. L.K. Maharana, Adv. COROM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 02.05.2026 3. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- In view of the above facts and circumstances, the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to allow the writ petition and direct the opposite party no 1 and 2 to refund the deposited amount and the security. deposit along with interest, in favour of the petitioner. AND Further, direct the opposite party no 1 and 2 to return the transformer and other accessories installed by the petitioner or in the alternative, reimburse the cost thereof. AND p. 2 p. 2 Declare that the petitioner is not liable to pay the outstanding dues of the erstwhile owner, M/S Baikuntha Cotton Mill. Pass any other order(s)/direction(s) as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. And for the said act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray. .4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of its claim, if any, within a period of 3(three) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge sangita