2025:JHHC:31532 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4054 of 2018 - Shefali Devi aged about 37 years wife of late Bhola Nath Mandal Resident of village-Kundari Tola Mohanpur P.O. Tupkadih P.S.-Balidih District Bokaro (Jharkhand) ...Petitioner Versus 1. The Chief Executive Officer, Bokaro Steel Limited, Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S.- Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro Jharkhand 2. Hemant Kumar Mandal, Permanent Resident of Village-Kundari Tola Mohanpur, P.O.-Tupkadih P.S.-Balidih, District-Bokaro, (Jharkhand)-827010, At present residing at Bokaro Steel City, Sector- 09B, Qtr. No. 212, Street No. 34, P.O.-Sector-9B P.S.-Sector 9B, District Bokaro Jharkhand, 827010 Mobile No. 9931340640 ..Respondents -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate -- 12/08.10.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for issuing mandamus upon the respondents, especially respondent no. 2 to pay Rs. 05 Lacks at once and Rs. 4000/- per month from his salary to the Petitioner as because the respondent no. 2 is not abiding the terms and conditions of the agreement executed between the petitioner and respondent no. 2 at the time of appointment of respondent no. 2 in Bokaro Steel Plant. 3. From the prayer itself, it is crystal clear that the mandamus is sought to be enforced upon the private individual for implementation of an agreement. 2025:JHHC:31532 2 4. In view of the prayer itself and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner is having an alternative remedy of specific performance of contract and also the undertaking which was given by respondent no. 2 for keeping the petitioner, in accordance with the agreement, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned civil court for implementation of the agreement, if so advised. 5. Learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner would be at liberty to take help of entire pleadings filed by respondent no. 2 in this case, wherein it has been admitted that there was some agreement between the parties. 6. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 8th October, 2025 Jk Uploaded on 4/11/2025