2025:HHC:45146 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No. 1165 of 2024 Decided on: 23.12.2025 Chander Bhan … Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation… Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mrs. Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent informs the Court that everything that was due to the petitioner stands paid to him. He has referred to the compliance affidavit-cum-calculation sheet, which is ordered to be taken on record. 3. In light of this development, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that these proceedings can be closed but with liberty to the petitioner that in case judgment is not complied with in totality, he may approach the Court by way of a fresh execution petition. Ordered accordingly. The proceedings are closed, with liberty as prayed for. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge December 23, 2025 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?