NANDLAL AND 11 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/10061/2025 · 2025-07-27
Dinesh Pathak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33732 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33732 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123581 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 10061 of 2025 Applicant :- Nandlal And 11 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Kumar Kulshrestha,Kamlesh Kumar Kanojiya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State respondent and perused the record on Board. 2. The applicants have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the entire proceedings as well as impugned order dated 1.6.2021 in Session Trial No. 309 of 2021 (State vs. Nand Lal Dhobi and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 213 of 2020 under Sections 188, 147, 148, 323, 324, 308, 504, 352, 506 IPC and 3 (1) (द) SC/ST Act, Police Station- Ramkola, District- Kushinagar, pending in the court of Special Judge SC/ST Act, Kushinagar at Padrauna. 3. As per medical report (Annexure no.6) grievous injury inflicted on the opposite party no.2 and one Subhash. 4. After due deliberation at length, learned counsel for the applicants chose not to press the instant application on merits. However, he has urged for interim protection to the present applicants so that they may appear before the court below and participate in the court proceedings. It is submitted that present applicants are ready and willing to appear before the court below to cooperate in the trial. They have never intended to ignore the court proceedings. As such, some protection may be granted. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in case protection is granted to the present applicants to enable them to appear before the court below to participate in the court proceedings. 6. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present application, without making any observation on the merits of the case as mentioned in the present application, with a direction that in case present
applicants appear/surrender and move bail application before the court below within a period of three weeks from today, same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter. 7.
7. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicants in aforesaid criminal case. 8. As per observation made above, instant application is disposed of. Order Date :- 28.7.2025/vkg Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad