ATTHA @ CHANDRABHAN S/O KIRTI SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/646/2025 · 2025-03-06
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3373 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3373 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:10074] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 646/2025 Attha @ Chandrabhan S/o Kirti Singh, R/o Gram Dhaundhe Ka Pura, Sadar Badi, District Dholpur Raj. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shipra Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 06/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.64/2022 registered at Police Station Saipau, District Dholpur (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 382, 458 and 506 of IPC.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that false allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. It is contended that charge-sheet has been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time in its completion. Petitioner is in custody since 08.04.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that petitioner is a
[2025:RJ-JP:10074] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-646/2025] habitual offender as 11 other cases have been registered against him.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, so also the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Attha @ Chandrabhan S/o Kirti Singh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first & third week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded.
8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police
[2025:RJ-JP:10074] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-646/2025] station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.
10. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /113