Gitalaxmi 14-IA-209-2025.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 209 OF 2025 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 137 OF 2024 SHRI. PRASANNAN K. R. AND ANOTHER ...APPLICANTS Versus INDIRARANI UGRASEN AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS Mr. B. K. Pandey, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Laxmikant Patil i/b Mr. Anilkumar Patil, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 14th AUGUST, 2026. Per Court : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the Applicants points out that the Advocate on record for the Applicants was hospitalized and expired on 19th July, 2024. Thereafter the matter was attended by another Advocate, who did not have instructions. Thereafter as none had appeared on behalf of the Applicants, by order dated 21st November, 14th AUGUST, 2026 Gitalaxmi 14-IA-209-2025.docx 2024, Civil Revision Application No. 137 of 2024 came to be dismissed. 3. Considering the reasons given in the present Interim Application No. 209 of 2025 for restoration, Civil Revision Application No. 137 of 2024 along with Interim Application No. 6370 of 2024 stand restored to its original stage. 4. Interim Application No. 209 of 2025 of restoration stands disposed of accordingly. 5. List this matter for further consideration on 28th August, 2026. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] 14th AUGUST, 2026 GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Digitally signed by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2026.08.18 14:59:47 +0530