Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33719 (KAR)

M MUTTARAYAPPA v. SANNAPALAMMA

MFA/8157/2022 · 2025-06-04

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18755 MFA No. 8157 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8157 OF 2022(ECA) BETWEEN: M. MUTTARAYAPPA, S/O MUTTARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT CHINNAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, K.T. HALLI POST, NIDGAL HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 101. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. PRIYANKA KWATRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HARISH H. V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SANNAPALAMMA S/O LATE GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 2. K. G. RAJASHEKAR, S/O LATE GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 3. BHAGYALAKSHMI D/O LATE GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT KARIYAMMANA PALYA VILLAGE, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18755 MFA No. 8157 of 2022 MUGADALABETTA POST, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572 101. 4. THE MANAGER UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE NO.7/3, 2ND FLOOR, K.V.D. TOWER, OLD MADRAS ROAD, 100 FEET RING ROAD, INDIRA NAGARA, BANGALORE-560 008. …RESPONDENTS (R2 - SERVED) THIS MFA FILED U/S 30(1) EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.04.2018 PASSED IN ECA NO.26/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADDITIONAL MACT, PAVAGADA, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.6,50,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF THE CLAIM PETITION UNTIL REALIZATION OF THE ENTIRE AWARD AMOUNT TO THE PETITIONERS. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18755 MFA No. 8157 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT Ms.Priyanka Kwatra representing Sri.Harish.H.V, learned counsel on record for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Memo filed to that effect is also on record. Having considered the contents of the memo filed, permission as prayed for is accorded. The appeal therefore is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE NS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7