IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.415 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2020 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Dil Afroj W/O Md. Abdul Kudus Resident Of Village - Paharpur, P.O.- Dilawarapur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Md. Shahabuddin Siddiqi @ Gulab Son of Late Mohiuddin Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 3. Md. Manjar Hussain Son of Md. Noor Hasan Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 4. Md. Kalam Son of Md. Noor Hasan Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 5. Md. Faishal Son of Md. Kalam Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 6. Md. Faizan Son of Md. Kalam Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 7. Md. Faizi @ Faiz Son of Md. Kalam Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 8. Md. Naiyar @ Jawed Naiyar Son of Manjar Hussain Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 9. Md. Naushad @ Waist Ashraf S/o Manjar Hussain Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 10. Md. Saukat Ali Son of Badrul Haque Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 11. Shabir Son of Md. Isha Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. 12. Md. Shakir Son of Md. Kalam Resident of Village - Chilha Paharpur, P.S.- Baheri, Distt.- Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 07-04-2025 Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has not removed the defect(s) as Patna High Court CR. REV. No.415 of 2021(4) dt.07-04-2025 2/2 pointed out by the office, despite sufficient opportunity, which shows lack of interest on the part of the petitioner to prosecute the present case. 3. Hence, the present case is dismissed for non- prosecution. ravishankar/- (Jitendra Kumar, J.) U T