[2025:RJ-JP:12261] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.14908/2024 Dinesh Rebari S/o Shri Roopa Rebari, R/o Rebariyo Ki Dhani, Chhota Lamba, Police Station Arain, District Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 18/03/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.94/2024, registered at Police Station Arain, District Ajmer, for the offence(s) under Sections 8/15 of the N.D.P.S. Act, the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the recovery of contraband article was effected from the other co-accused Shaitan Lal, who has already been enlarged on regular bail by the Co-ordinate Bench. Apart from the disclosure statement of the co-accused Shaitan Lal, there are no other substantive evidence available on record showing that the accused-petitioner has supplied the said contraband articles to the other co-accused Shaitan Lal. The present petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, custodial interrogation [2025:RJ-JP:12261] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14908/2024] of the petitioner is not required, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail application. It is contended that the petitioner and the co-accused were in regular contact through mobile phone and the co-accused has disclosed the name of the present petitioner. It is also contended that the petitioner was involved in one similar nature of offence under Sections 8/15 and 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act and he is a habitual offender, therefore, the instant anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Apart from the disclosure statement of the other co-accused and their connectivity through mobile calls, there are no other substantive evidence available on record showing that the petitioner has supplied the said contraband articles to the main co-accused Shaitan Lal, who has already been enlarged on regular bail. The petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not required and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Dinesh Rebari S/o Shri Roopa Rebari, in connection with FIR No.94/2024, registered at Police Station Arain, District Ajmer, he shall be released on bail, provided he [2025:RJ-JP:12261] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14908/2024] furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-147