MOHD. SAMEER @ SAMEER AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/23029/2022 · 2025-08-17
Raj Beer Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33716 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33716 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:141540 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23029 of 2022 Applicant :- Mohd. Sameer @ Sameer And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Uttam Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State. 2. This application u/s 482 CrPC has been filed for quashing of entire proceedings, including charge-sheet dated 30.05.2019 as well as summoning order dated 11.02.2020, of Criminal Case No. 6022/2020 (State v. Sameer and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 160/2019, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452 I.P.C., P.S.- Babu Purwa, District- Kanpur Nagar, pending before M.M. Court No. 9, Kanpur Nagar, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the alleged dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident no one has sustained any serious injury. In pursuance to order dated 16.08.2022, passed by this Court, both the parties have filed compromise before the trial court, which has duly been verified vide order dated 16.09.2022, the certified copy of the same is available on record. It was submitted that in view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned
proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 482 CrPC. In the instant case, the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. The injured has not sustained any serious injury. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. The informant of the case and injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. There is nothing to indicate that applicants have any criminal antecedents.
The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering the aforesaid facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 7. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings, including charge-sheet & cognizance / summoning order, of the aforesaid case, against applicants, namely, Mohd. Sameer @ Sameer and Azaz are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 CrPC is allowed. Order Date :- 18.8.2025 Rama Kant Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad