[2025:RJ-JP:86] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.14979/2024 Sokeen Mohd. S/o Nannu Khan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Near Masjid Palayetha Police Station Anta District Baran (Raj.) (Petitioner Presently Confined In Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhim Singh Meena, Adv. with Mr. Vikas Kumar Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.425/2024, registered at Police Station Anta, District Baran for the offence(s) under Section 309(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated under Sections 310(2) and 61(2) of BNS. It is contended that the main allegations of committing robbery of jewelry articles are against the other co- accused namely, 1. Meran @ Mehran Khan, 2. Shoyab @ Gamori and 3. Aabid Khan @ Kaka. It is alleged against the accused- petitioner that he conducted surveillance of the complainant and furnished information to the other co-accused. It is also contended that apart from the disclosure note of the co-accused, there is no [2025:RJ-JP:86] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14979/2024] substantive evidence available on the record indicating the fact that the accused-petitioner conducted surveillance of the complainant, thereafter, furnished information to the other co- accused. No recovery was effected from the possession of the accused-petitioner, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and investigation/trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the accused-petitioner conducted recce of the complainant and thereafter, furnished information to the main accused. It is alleged against the other co-accused, who committed robbery of jewelry articles from the possession of the complainant, therefore, considering the allegation levelled against the accused-petitioner, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the main allegations of committing robbery of jewelry articles are against the other co-accused namely, 1. Meran @ Mehran Khan, 2. Shoyab @ Gamori and 3. Aabid Khan @ Kaka. There are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the investigation/trial of the case may take considerable time, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- [2025:RJ-JP:86] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14979/2024] Sokeen Mohd. S/o Nannu Khan, in connection with FIR No.425/2024, registered at Police Station Anta, District Baran, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-83