Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33713 (ORI)

ALOK KUMAR DASH v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/13048/2025 · 2025-05-15

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.13048 of 2025 Alok Kumar Dash …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Samal, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 15.05.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Therefore, in view of the above said facts and circumstances, it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to direct the opposite parties, more particularly to Opp. Party No.2, Collector- cum-Chairman, Samagra Sikhya Abhiyan, Nayagarh to consider the case of the petitioner for engagement as Part Time Physical Education Instructor and he may be given engagement as Part Time Physical Education Instructor pursuant to the advertisement as he has participated in State Level as well as national level Sports competitions as per Annexure-2 Series and vacancies are still available as 81 nos. have not been filled up as yet, within a time to be stipulated by this Hon’ble Court; And any other order/orders or direction/directions may be issued so as to give complete relief to the petitioner; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall remain ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-7 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7 within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti