AMEER CHAND S/O SH. RAM PAL v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
CW/18202/2024 · 2025-03-07
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33711 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33711 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:10397] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18202/2024 Ameer Chand S/o Sh. Ram Pal, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Village Basiya, Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarters, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Inspector General Of Police, Range Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivaswaan Dikshit for Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 07/03/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was suspended vide impugned order dated 14.07.2023. Further, it is apprised to this Court that as on date, petitioner is receiving 75 percent emoluments. It is further submitted that on account of proceedings pending at Bharatpur, respondents are under apprehension that petitioner might influence the witness at the said placed, resultantly, the petitioner is denied posting at the said place vide
order dated 21.09.2024.
[2025:RJ-JP:10397] (2 of 2) [CW-18202/2024] In this regard, it is submitted that petitioner has to shoulder the responsibility of the family, therefore, it is prayed that petitioner can be posted at any other place to render duties.
Learned counsel for the respondent-State has submitted that Screening
Committee
formulated
will
consider
the contention/prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and accordingly pass necessary orders in the next meeting. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, this Courts directs concerned Screening Committee to consider the prayer so made by the petitioner and pass necessary orders, strictly in accordance with law, by way of a speaking order, within a period of two months from the date of passing of this order. Additionally, petitioner is at liberty to file representation before the Screening Committee qua other issues (revocation of suspension) for consideration. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned direction. Pending applications, if any, shall stand
disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/211