Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3371 (ALL)

KANEEZ TAHIRA RIZVI v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRIN SECY REVENUE AND 3 ORS

WRIA/3002/2005 · 2026-07-29

Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20335 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3002 of 2005 Petitioner :- Kaneez Tahira Rizvi Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Prin Secy Revenue And 3 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- M.A.Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. However, learned Standing Counsel is present. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2005 and since then it has remained pending. It appears that petitioner has lost his interest to pursue his case. Apart from it, by efflux of time, writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 5. However, it is open for the petitioner move a recall application if the cause still survives. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench