[2025:RJ-JP:15510-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 2205/2024 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.432/2024 1. Moolchand Son Of Dhulilal, Aged About 63 Years, (At Present 72 Years) Resident Of Daulatpura Police Station Baran Sadar District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail Kota) 2. Pramod Son Of Moolchand, Aged About 37 Years, (At Present 46Years) Resident Of Daulatpura Police Station Baran Sadar District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail Kota) 3. Pradeep Kumar Son Of Moolchand, Aged About 27 Years, (At Present 36 Years) Resident Of Daulatpura Police Sta- tion Baran Sadar District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail Kota) 4. Lalchand Son Of Madanlal, Aged About 37 Years, (At Present 46 Years) Resident Of Daulatpura Police Station Baran Sadar District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail Kota) 5. Premshankar Alias Premnarayan Son Of Balmukand, Aged About 43 Years, (At Present 52 Years) Resident Of Kalmanda Police Kotwali District Baran (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adl. G.A HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order [2025:RJ-JP:15510-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-2205/2024] 07/04/2025 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the applicants along with this appeal. 2. Counsel for the applicants has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that during the trial, the applicants were on bail and the sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the applicants under Sec- tion 302/149 of IPC and they are in judicial custody. Counsel further submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this matter and the material eye-witness has been declared hostile during trial and hearing of appeals may take long time and prayed that sentence awarded to the applicants may be suspended and they be released on bail during the pendency of this appeal. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 4. We have heard counsels for the parties and perused the record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the applicants were on bail during trial and the hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence appli- cation. 6. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous sus- pension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicants shall remain sus- pended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the appli- cants be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court [2025:RJ-JP:15510-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-2205/2024] with the stipulation that they shall appear before this Court on 26.05.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the con- cerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J DIKSHA MISHRA /53