Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33705 (HP)

SANDEEP CHAUDHARY v. PRIYANKA

CRMPM/704/2025 · 2025-10-07

Romesh Verma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sandeep Chaudhary vs. Priyanka Cr.MP (M) No. 704/2025 7.10.2025 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner/applicant. Ms. Ruchika Khachi, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr.MP (M) No. 704/2025 Though reply has not been filed, however prayer for condonation of delay has been opposed vehemently on the ground that day to day delay, as required to be explained under the law, has not been explained, whereas learned counsel for the applicant submits that genuine cause was existing, which prevented the applicant from filing the revision petition within limitation period. Considering the pleadings as well as submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, delay of 50 days in filing of the revision petition is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No. /2025 (Cr. R. (FC) ST 1938/2025) Be registered. Records be requisitioned. List for consideration on 15.12.2025. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Romesh Verma) Judge 7.10.2025 (pankaj)