AMREEN BEGUM RIYAZ MOHAMMED v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CP/922/2018 · 2025-10-03
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Smt Vaishali Patil Jadhav
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33701 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33701 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
cp922-18.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.922 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 15109 OF 2017 Amreen Begum Riyaz Mohammed PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. A. C. Pathan h/f Mr. R. I. Wakode, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. K. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent - State .......
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 3
rd OCTOBER, 2025
ORDER :
1. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner has placed on record communication dated 24th December, 2018 to contend that the
order is complied with. Copy of the said communication is marked “X” for the purpose of identification.
2. In view of compliance of the order, the Contempt Petition is disposed of.
3. The Petitioner is at liberty to adopt appropriate legal remedy, if he is aggrieved by the said communication.
[ SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/cp922-18.doc