Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33694 (RAJ)

SAHEED S/O JAWANSINGH @ KADAKA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15225/2024 · 2025-02-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8101] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15225/2024 Saheed S/o Jawansingh @ Kadaka, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Padla, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. (Currently In Sub Jail Deeg, Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/02/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR No.179/2024 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a), 313, 317(5), 303(2) & 318(4) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 06.11.2024. Learned counsel further submits that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Learned counsel further submit that no [2025:RJ-JP:8101] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15225/2024] other criminal case is pending against the petitioner. Therefore, he may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2024, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner named above shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-, together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the accused-persons of particular areas, who are involved in the cases of online fraud, after their release from such a criminal case, often celebrate their release in public. Hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is imposed that the petitioner shall not celebrate his release in public and if he is found to be [2025:RJ-JP:8101] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15225/2024] involved in celebrating his release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /11