Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33694 (AP)

RONGALI GANGA BHAVANI v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/26723/2024 · 2025-09-03

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010509012024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 26723/2024 Between: 1. RONGALI GANGA BHAVANI, W/O RAVI SHANKAR, AGED 40 YRS, D.NO.8-15-9, GROUND FLOOR, NETAJI STREET, CHINNA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM-530017- ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (MEIT YO NEW DELHI). 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, (MEESEVA) VISAKHAPATNAM 3. THE DIRECTOR ESD MEESEVA, PLOT NO. 11 AND 12, BACK SIDE OF BSNL, TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, AUTONAGAR VIJAYAWADA-520007 4. M/S RAMINFO LIMITED, REP., BY ITS PROJECT MANAGER, BRANCH OFFICE AT SPROUT BUSINESS CENTRE PVT LTD., D.NO.40-14-8/2 , NEAR JYOTHI CONVENTION HALL, BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA-520010 - 5. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus ,declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the Respondent No.2 directing the 3rd and 4th Respondents to immediately disable the services and cancel the permission of Meeseva Centre (V032) relates to the Petitioner Situated at CBI down, Chinawaltair, Visakhapatnam all are Illegal, Unlawful, without issuance of any notice or following the process of law. Violation of Principles of Natural Justice, Violation of Article 14,19,21 of the Constitution of India, consequently to direct the 2 Respondents 2 to 4 to Restore the Meeseva Centre(V032) Services of the Petitioner situated at CBI down, Chinawaltair, Visakhapatnam in the interest of the justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to Restore the Meeseva Centre (V032) Situated at CBI down, Chinawaltair, Visakhapatnam there to permit the petitioner to operate pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in the interest of the justice, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. -- The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 26723 of 2024 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition and also endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 04.09.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO W.P.No. 26723 OF 2024 Date: 04.09.2025 SPP