HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19155/2022 M/s. United Engineering Industries, G-2309, RIICO Industrial Area, Ramchandrapura, Sitapura Extension, Sanganer, Jaipur- 302020 (Rajasthan) Through Proprietor Sushil Saini Wife of Late Shri Teeka Ram Saini R/o 21, Arjunpuri, Imli Wala Phatak, Jyoti Nagar, Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus The Registrar of Trade Marks (Govt. of India), Near Chanakyapuri Overbridge, Ghatlodiya, Ahmedabad (Guj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.D. Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Divyesh Maheshwari JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that the Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition. Further, issue a writ of mandamus or may other suitable writ/order directing the respondent to proceed the FROM TM- P date 10.06.2021 in an application No. 3210610 dated 14.03.2016 for the registered trademark “SAKURA”. Any other order/writ/direction, may also be passed which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in favor of the Petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the registered Trademark of “SAKURA” was allotted to the husband of the petitioner who is proprietor of M/s. United Engineering Industries by the registered trademark and the same is valid upto (2 of 2) [CW-19155/2022] 14.03.2016. Counsel submits that the husband of the petitioner has expired on 11.07.2020 and thereafter an application was submitted by the petitioner with Form TM-P in the office of the respondents in the month of June, 2021 for taking her on record by way of her substitution. Counsel submits that the said application submitted by the petitioner is lying pending for its disposal since last more than four years, so appropriate direction be issued to the registered Trademark to decide the said application expeditiously. 3. Counsel for the respondent has no objection. 4 Considering the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the application submitted by the petitioner is lying pending before the respondents since last more than four years, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition by issuing a direction to the respondent to decide the said application expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 5 Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/12