M/S.RAGHAVA CONSTRUCTIONS (INDIA) PVT.LTD v. P.S. PRADYUMMA
CC/5511/2023 · 2025-09-07
V Sujatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33688 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33688 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010507722023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5511/2023 Between:
1. M/S.RAGHAVA CONSTRUCTIONS (INDIA) PVT.LTD, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR P.PRASAD REDDY, S/O.LATE RAGHAVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O.H.NO.8-2-603/1/27 8628, ROAD NO.10,
RAGHAVA PRIDE, BANJARAHILLS, HYDERABAD.
...PETITIONER AND
1. P S PRADYUMMA, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
2. RAMACHANDRA, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, (RANDB), NH AND CRF, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. V UMA MAHESWARA REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R AND B CIRCLE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. M STANELY JONES, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (R AND B) MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. S S RAWATH I A S, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
2 VS,J C.C.No.5511 of 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honourable High Court dated 29.03.2023 in W.P.No. 3420 of 2023 by the Lordships SRI JUSTICE V SUJATHA and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. S NISCHALA REDDY
2. ASHOK RAM V The Court made the following:
3 VS,J C.C.No.5511 of 2023
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner, informed this Court that he submitted a letter dated 02.09.2025 before the Registry for withdrawal, which is placed on record, and hence seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the contempt case.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 08.09.2025 KGR