Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.19770 of 2025 Decided on: 15.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Savita Devi
…..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents.
2. Petitioner seeks regularization of her services. Her case is that she preferred a representation alongwith others on 17.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.3 seeking regularization but the aforesaid representation has not been considered and decided as yet. Reliance in support of her claim has been made upon in Jaggo versus Union of India and others.2 Learned counsel for 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 SLP(C) No.5580/2024, decided on 20.12.2024.
2 the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 17.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Jaggo2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 15, 2025 Judge yogesh