Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33681 (JHR)

VISHWANATH SAO ALIAS BISHNATH SAW v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5941/2025 · 2025-10-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:31362 --1-- A.B.A. No. 5941 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5941 of 2025 ---- Vishwanath Sao @ Bishnath Saw, aged about 32 years, son of Rohan Saw, resident of village – Rupandih, PO and PS – Domchanch, District - Koderma .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Kri. Rashmi, Advocate ---- 02/10.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1434 of 2024, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 33, 41 and 42 of Indian Forest Act (Bihar Amendment Act, 1989) pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the allegations are made that on motorcycle mica scrap was being carried. He further submits that even the motorcycle is not belonging to the petitioner and the false allegations are made against the petitioner of fleeing away from the spot. He then submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as 2025:JHHC:31362 --2-- A.B.A. No. 5941 of 2025 disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioner of illegally carrying the mica scrap on motorcycle. 5. Considering that the petitioner is not the owner of motorcycle and the name of the petitioner has come on suspicion and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.13 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Complaint Case No.1434 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 10.10.2025 Sangam/