HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10994 of 2023 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and Shri Sujeet Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Vinod Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case investigation has already been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioners. It is further submitted that upon the said charge-sheet, cognizance has been taken by the concerned Magistrate and the petitioners have been summoned to face trial. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has next submitted that against the order, summoning the petitioners, an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 21771 of 2024 has already been preferred, which is pending before this Court, as such, the instant writ petition has become infructuous and it be dismissed accordingly. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durga Shanker Shukla, Mahesh Dwivedi, Vishwas Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amit Tiwari, G.A., Subhash Chandra Tiwari, Vinod Kumar Upadhyay, Vivek Kumar Shukla Alok Kumar Mishra And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for respondent no.4 do not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 15, 2025 Subham CRLP No. 10994 of 2023 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBHAM KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad