Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33679 (RAJ)

MADANLAL S/O GORURAM v. ANKUR PILANIYA S/O AVNINDRA DEV

CRLBC/175/2024 · 2025-01-10

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1590] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 175/2024 Madanlal S/o Goruram, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ajitpura, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ankur Pilaniya S/o Avnindra Dev, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 2, Ajitpura, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Raj.) 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya for Mr. Gajender Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 10/01/2025 It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that prima-facie, the case under Section 307 of IPC is made out against the respondent, therefore, the criminal bail cancellation application may be allowed. Heard and perused the material available on record. The impugned orders shows that the bail application of the respondent was allowed for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 427 and 504 of IPC and the said sections are triable by Magistrate, the offence(s) under Section 307 of IPC is not made out against the respondent. The Court after considering that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the allegations are pertaining to unlawful assembly along with the [2025:RJ-JP:1590] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-175/2024] assault, enlarged the respondent on bail under Section 437 of Cr.P.C. I do not find any ground to cancel the bail of the respondent. Hence, the criminal bail cancellation application is hereby, dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/56