Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33679 (JHR)

TULARAM NAIK ALIAS T.R. NAIK v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

A.B.A./5876/2025 · 2025-10-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:31284 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 5876 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5876 of 2025 Tularam Naik @ T.R. Naik, aged about 65 years, son of Late N. Naik, resident of Qr. No.MIG 81, Phase-3, Ananth Vihar Pokhriput, VTC Aerodrome Area, P.O. & P.S. Aerodrome Area, District- Khorda, Odisha, PIN-751020 … Petitioner -Versus- Central Bureau of Investigation … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Siddharth Ranjan, Advocate For the CBI : Mr. Deepak Kumar Bharati, Advocate ----- 06/09.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the CBI. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with R.C. Case No.05(A)/2019-R, registered for the offence under Section 120B read with Sections 420, 409, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018), pending in the Court of the learned AJC XVIII cum Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that two different chargesheets have been filed of two different collieries. He further submits that the allegations are made that the petitioner being the signing authority, has allowed withdrawal of the provident fund amount of ex-employees of the CCL. He then submits that the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail in the first chargesheet in A.B.A. No.6136 of 2024, which was filed in connection with the same R.C. Case. He next submits that in the present case, second chargesheet bearing No.05/2022 has already been submitted. He further submits that the co-accused person has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.7669 of 2024. He also submits that the petitioner will not tamper with any evidence during pendency of the trial. ( 2025:JHHC:31284 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 5876 of 2025 4. Learned counsel appearing for the CBI opposed the prayer and submits that fake person’s identification was made and thereafter the amount has been paid and in view of that, chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner in relation to another colliery, namely, Purnadih colliery of CCL. 5. In view of the above and considering that second chargesheet bearing No.05/2022 has already been submitted and the co-accused person has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.7669 of 2024 and the petitioner will not tamper with any evidence during pendency of the trial and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned AJC XVIII cum Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi in connection with R.C. Case No.05(A)/2019-R, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 9th October, 2025 Ajay/