Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33667 (JHR)

THE INDIAN CABLE WORKERS UNION REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY MR RAM VINOD SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2450/2024 · 2025-10-10

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:31395 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (C). No. 2450 of 2024 ------- The Indian Cable Workers' Union (Registration No. 94) having its registered office at 44, Shisam Road, New Cable Colony, P.O. & P.S. Golmuri, District Singhbhum East represented through its General Secretary being Mr. Ram Vinod Singh aged about 56 years son of Late Mahesh Singh resident of 44, Shisam Road, New Cable Colony, P.O. & P.S. Golmuri, Jamshedpur 831003 District Singhbhum East. ……….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand; 2. The Secretary Department, Department of Energy, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi; 3. Dy. Commissioner, Jamshedpur, having office at Sakchi, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District East Singhbhum Through chairmon 4. Tata Steel Ltd. a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1882, through its Chairman, having its Registered Office at "Bombay House", 24 Homi Mody Street, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra State and its principal place of works at Jamshedpur, P.O&P.S. Bistupur, in the town of Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum 5. Tata Steel Utilities and Infrastructure Services Limited a subsidiary Company of Tata Steel Limited having its Office at Northern Town, Bistupur, PO & PS Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum through its Managing Director; 6. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Tibrewal, Resolution Professional (M/s INCAB Industries Ltd.) at Chitra 3E, Duke Residency, 13, Chanditala Lane, Ashok Nagar Park, Tollygunge, Regent Park, P.O. & P.S. Tollygunge, District Kolkata 700040, West Bengal. ……….. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate (Through : VC) Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, AC to GA-III ---- 06/ 10.10.2025 The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent No. 4 to provide separate and individual electric connection to the residence of INCAB Colony, Golmuri, Jamshedpur. 2025:JHHC:31395 2 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of this Court towards the order dated 28.02.2025 wherein the occupants were directed to approach JUSCO Limited for supply of electric connection and it was directed that the same is to be decided in accordance with; as such, learned counsel submits that the instant application may be disposed of by directing the concerned JUSCO to provide electric connections subject to payment of normal charges which is being taken from the consumers because it is an essential commodities which is required to be given to every citizens. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents does not oppose to the aforesaid submission of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the instant application is disposed of by giving liberty to the individual occupants to approach the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 with individual applications(s) requesting for electric connection. If any such representation(s) is/ are presented before the concerned respondents it shall provide the electric connection and would be entitled to raise bill(s) and take payment for the electricity consumed by the individual occupants. 5. It goes without saying that if the JUSCO deems it fit and proper to take some undertaking/ indemnity, they would be at liberty to take the same, by providing the electric connection. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 10th October, 2025 Kunal Uploaded on 14/10/2025