IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Revision No. 166 of 2025. Decided on : 25 th November, 2025. Puran Chand ...Petitioner. Versus Parshotam Lal ....Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Vaishali Lakhanpal, Advocate. For the respondent: Nemo. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled the matter, hence, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 25th November, 2025. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? (jai) …2…