Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:139530 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29761 of 2022 Applicant :- Hariom Jatav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bindeshwari Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings of Case No.443 of 2020, (State v. Hariom Jatava and another), arising out of Case Crime No. 180 of 2018, under Sections 504, 506, 307 IPC, Police Station Basrehar, District Etawah, pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge 1st, Etawah, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the alleged dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident, though the applicants were also summoned for offence under Section 307 IPC but injured has not sustained any serious injury. Both the parties are residents of same place. In pursuance of order dated 20.09.2022, passed by this Court, both the parties have filed compromise before the trial court, which has duly been verified vide order dated 01.11.2022, the certified copy of the same is available on record. It was submitted that in view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicants and submitted that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the informant and the injured do not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 482 CrPC. In the instant case though applicants have been summoned for offence under Section 307 IPC but the injured has not sustained any serious injury. Both the parties are residents of same place. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. The informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. There is nothing to indicate that applicants have any criminal antecedents. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. In view of these facts and circumstances, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the entire impugned proceedings, including charge-sheet & cognizance / summoning order, of the aforesaid case, against applicants, namely, Hariom Jatav and Sunil Jatav are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 CrPC is allowed. Order Date :- 14.8.2025 I.A.Siddiqui Digitally signed by :- IMRAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad