1 2025:CGHC:33936 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 714 of 2025 1 - Executive Engineer (O And M) (Wrongly Mentioned In Impugned Order As Chief Executive Engineer), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Seepat, Office At Tifra, P.S. Sirgitti, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Assistant Engineer (Wrongly Mentiones In Impugned Order As Assistant Executive Engineer) Torwa, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Seepat, Old Power House P.S. Torwa, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Junior Engineer, Seepat, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, P.S. Seepat, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicants versus 1 - Smt. Ramkumari W/o Chhanu Lal Mauwar, Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Bitkula, P.S. Seepat, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhannu Lal Mauwar S/o Shri Saukhi Lal, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Bitkula, P.S. Seepat, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Collector, Tahsil District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Mr. Aniket Verma, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.07.18 15:34:20 +0530 2 For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr. Ashish Haldar, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Aman Ansari, Advocate For State/Respondent No.3 : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Govt. Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 18/07/2025 1. Heard on M.C.C., application for restoration of FA No.36/2022, which was dismissed vide order dated 27.06.2025 for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that on 27.06.2025, counsel appearing for the applicant was engaged in another Court, thus, he could not appear when the case was taken up for hearing, therefore, the same was dismissed for want of prosecution. Hence, the said mistake was bonafide and the applicant wants to contest the case on merits, thus the instant MCC may be allowed. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, instant MCC is hereby allowed. 4. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to restore FA No.36/2022, (Executive Engineer (O And M) and others vs. Smt. Ramkumari and Others) in its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi